Skip to content

The ‘letter’ load of codswallop and conspiracy

February 28, 2012

The whole dodgy letter business is getting worthy of a Mrs Marples episode.
This time last week the evening toast revealed that the last obstacle as they called it to the 30 000 seat stadium and all the other building works had now been removed.
What they are conspicuously silent about now is the fact that it’s now been revealed that the thing removed is not ‘the barrier’ but the original JR applicant who has mysteriously disappeared and been substituted by a stepson.
Looks to me like a complete con trick, what sort of a fool can’t see through that letter?
Not since the Sunday Times exclusively announced the discovery of Hitlers diaries has so ridiculous a forgery been trumpeted by the biased media and foolish politicians.

Here’s the almost unredacted letter from a supposed relative of the JR applicant telling us how much concern for youthful employment has caused the drastic u-turn. Link

  1. Richard Lane permalink
    February 29, 2012 11:00 pm

    Do you wonder why this man has dissapeared, when you come out with shit like this about his family.
    The truth is out, you lot couldn’t give a shit about the person used to get legal aid for the JR. He’s gone now so as far as your concerned he’s the enemy.
    You made all sorts of claims about the pressure and threats he was getting, yet it was the applicants supporters that put him in that position. Now when he’s had enough and seen the light, you make derogatory comments about his letter, his meaning and his supposed family.

  2. bobs permalink
    March 1, 2012 8:46 am

    You ‘t don’t why this man has disappeared Richard. Only the guardian and SDR know the truth. But Bobs knows more than you do – but his guardian won’t let him tell you.

  3. March 1, 2012 8:51 am

    Mr Lane, it’s your new stadium supporters that has the history of hunting out names and threats to individual campaigners and councillors, and acts of vandalism. You are in gross denial. The TVG’ers are a friendly bunch of normal people that don’t indulge in the obsessive tribalism that you promote.
    It is my opinion that the letter is suspicious, the judge will decide on that and whether there is still a case to answer.

  4. Paul Bemmy Down permalink
    March 1, 2012 11:33 am

    As SL wisely said, let the law take its’ course. This has become an issue where there are far more losers than winners. The football club have suffered badly on the field, SL has, in my opinion, a very different approach than a few years ago and seems far more reluctant to spend his money, and a new stadium will almost certainly not bring the success promised and probably bring more discontent. Ashton Vale residents will have the obvious negative impact of a new stadium, but has the JR stopped them for preparing for the possibility of the stadium. I would be preparing to make sure the planning agreements were honoured. The waste was removed safely, the parking restrictions put in place, don’t forget the football club have lost 1,000 promised parking spaces, etc. etc. It may be too late to have ammicable agreements, but if the stadium gets the go-ahead, it won’t be the end of the story.

  5. Richard Lane permalink
    March 1, 2012 8:46 pm


    Let’s get this straight then. You claim that only the guardian and SDR know the truth.
    So how do you know more than me?
    The only posible answer using your theory is that, you are either SDR or the guardian.
    If you are either of those people, which I seriously doubt, then it’s no wonder you are so mixed up. Call your guardian and ask him to section you.


    Tribalism! that’s a new one to add to your list of accusations.
    You have a warped sense of reality, that leads you to add two and two together and come out with five.
    If you lot weren’t so secretive in your scheming ways, or had the balls to use your real names whilst abusing, bullying, accusing, name calling, ridiculling, lying, exagerating, misquoting, misrepresenting, gloryfying, using pseudonyms to hide behind, whilst carrying out your actions. Nobody would need to ask themselves or others who these anonymous people are that are holding the city of Bristol back with their deceitful actions.

    We all know who Bill and Tim are, what terrible things have happened to them?
    Everyone knows George, Alice, Charlie, Tess, Ben, Steve, Ron, Peter, Anthony, Charlie.
    What acts of violence, threats have happened to them from the army of football hooligans that support BCFC and the stadium?
    Answer= SFA.

    As I’ve said before, many things have happened to my property over the last three years and I’ve been subjected to all sorts of accusations and treatment from your so called friendly normal people. I could easily have made similar claims to you, but have chosen not to go down that path. I’m just happy in the knowledge that I have conducted myself in a reasonable way until provoked, when compared to the likes of you.

    I want you to give me evidence of a threat to an inividual campaigner from a supporter of the planned stadium, rather than a claim of a threat.

  6. March 2, 2012 9:03 am

    As I said Mr Lane, in denial. You continue to target individuals whilst claiming not to.

    You and your tribe are the ones who continually have targeted names and addresses of residents, as proves the point in your numbskull last comment.
    There’s a big difference between local residents and the high profile tycoons, professional highly paid employees of your club and politicians who court publicity, which you are obviously too thick to discern.
    You flatter yourself if you believe anyone cares who you are other than a noise on the Internet.
    Maybe the judge’s decision today will shut you up.

  7. Richard Lane permalink
    March 5, 2012 8:29 pm


    Just as I thought, not one bit of evidence, not even an attempt at providing some. Just another couple of claims and the usual insults.

    So where have I targeted individuals? Yet another claim.

    I am very aware that nobody cares who I am. That’s why you lot love having a go at denouncing me, or trying to prove me wrong. Only to fail, then revert back to the trusty insults that the nice normal people that oppose the stadium love to use.

  8. March 6, 2012 10:04 am

    Mr Lane you have dished out plenty of insults over the years.
    The normal local residents don’t need their names published for the nuttier element of the football club to target them their homes and families. Pity Stevie and co haven’t spoken out publicly to keep the issues away from vendettas, they seem to have enjoyed the fanatical backing for hypermarket etc like its a local derby. But this is not a soccer match where its deemed ok to target the opposition with everything unpleasant including the admittedly less frequent now acts of violence. We are local residents, unlike the majority of football fans who don’t have to live with the consequences.

  9. Richard Lane permalink
    March 7, 2012 12:20 am

    For once you are correct, I have dished out plenty of insults over the years. Every one of those insults has been a response to a previous insult aimed at myself, from the likes of you and the nice normal people that support a TVG application, which designed to stop the building of a stadium, not the development of a village green.
    The same nice normal people that like making accusations, allegations and exagerations in a vain attempt to hide what they are really trying to do.

    We all know there are a few idiots that attend football matches. Now do me the honour of explaining why those people that I’ve mentioned before, that are high profile, in the public eye and who oppose the stadium and support the TVG very publicly, have not been targetted by these few idiots that attend football matches, instead of the annonymous people that live in AV?

    You are a fine one to talk when it comes to claims of targeting the opposition with everything unpleasant, hypocrite.

Comments are closed.